Update on Linton’s Public Comment Policy: FREE ARTICLE

On August 11, 2025, I attended the Linton City Council meeting to formally voice my opposition to the city’s current public comment policy. By speaking on record, I ensured that the mayor, council, and city attorney were publicly notified of the ordinance’s constitutional issues.

I presented multiple case laws and legal arguments showing why the policy is unconstitutional and requested that the city council, mayor, and attorney receive First Amendment training. Unfortunately, no response or commitment was given during the meeting to either request.

Afterward, I spoke directly with Mayor Preble. He confirmed that he forwarded my legal rebuttal and a draft of a new, fully constitutional ordinance (already prepared and ready to adopt) to the council and city attorney for review. However, he could not provide a clear timeline for when – or if – changes will be made.

It is worth noting that Councilmembers Gregg Sapp and Linda Bedwell have expressed some support for reform, and I sincerely appreciate their willingness to consider change.

For context:

• I first raised this issue with city leadership at the end of May.
• I met personally with the mayor on July 21st to provide full legal documentation.
• Nearly three months later, no meaningful steps have been taken.
• Meanwhile, in less time, the city has drafted and moved forward on a new public records ordinance.

This delay is concerning. If a policy is known to be unconstitutional, why not simply fix it? By refusing to act, the city risks unnecessary liability and legal consequences that could easily be avoided.

I want to thank everyone who has reached out with calls, messages, and encouragement. Your support is what keeps me motivated to continue pushing for accountability and protecting the rights of Linton residents. I will keep you updated as this develops.

Until then, I’ll keep asking the same question:
If you know a law is unconstitutional, why wouldn’t you change it?